College playground charges who should pay for this-www.33bbb.com

College playground charges who should pay for this? Site resources are not a problem, the real problem is money. In the form of social welfare, subsidized by the government departments to the school, and then let the public to enjoy the mentality of enjoyment, and then, schools and the public will feel embarrassed? Free open University of Shanghai for Science and Technology track and field, now began to charge. This makes the surrounding citizens a lot of dissatisfaction. Especially the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology recharge card, each 110 yuan, 10 minutes more than 15 minutes per hour charge, the public feel that affordability can not afford to play, but also feel that the university this approach is "can not afford to play."". A closer look at the announcement of Shanghai Polytechnic University shows that free lunch is still available, but is limited to "from Monday to Friday from 8 to 9, after 17 in winter, after 18 in summer", and the rest of the time is not open. On Sunday and during the winter and summer holidays, the school track and field can be opened, but the fees must be charged. Free time is the time of the public is chicken ribs, the charge of prime time exercise. The abacus of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology is still a little bit refined. The explanation of this, so far, and none of the provisions of the relevant documents, it must give a free lunch, not to mention the need to manage costs; and, because the previous field disorderly open conflict also occurs frequently with the students of school personnel. From the school free and charge period design, site resources is not a problem, the real problem is money. One side is the sports venues and facilities idle, while living and moving space more narrow public sports resources for these "envious"; while the real cost of management and the possible liability risk, while the public want to provide a health benefit for themselves. These contradictions are not only in Shanghai, but also in many cities all over the country. Although under the leadership of government departments, more and more schools have come up with a certain period of time, the site provided to the community, but a paper of guidance documents, basically still stay in the "obligation" to provide the stage. This should be the main reason why schools and other institutions are not enthusiastic enough. After all, the appearance of the venue is also just, also have to catch up with manpower, but also the loss of facilities, but also need management staff to work overtime holidays, an embarrassing situation arising from it – on the surface, more doors open, but the public still feel thirsty. The "trade" between University of Shanghai for Science and Technology and residents is actually a party with sports venues and facilities, trying to break through the blind area of guidance documents and solve the embarrassing situation of a water test. Whether the fees are high or not, it’s only a stopgap. In the long run, sports venues and facilities, including schools, should be open to the public scientifically and rationally, which should be the most economical, convenient and most effective way to alleviate the difficulties of daily fitness of urban residents. But this path should not be addressed by economic levers, by the school with resources, and by citizens who crave free lunches. On the one hand, the bargaining power is not in line with a reference; on the other hand, in the complete set of sports and fitness City, the relevant departments to the public debt is enough. 2014 State Council will be single

高校操场收费谁该为此埋单?   场地资源不是问题,真正的问题在于钱。以社会福利的形式,由政府部门补贴给学校,再让市民以福利的心态去享受,到那时,学校和市民还会感到为难吗?   免费对外开放的上海理工大学田径场,而今开始收费了。这让周边市民颇多不满。尤其是上海理工大学办的这张充值卡,每张110元,进场10分钟以上按每小时15元收费,市民觉得承受能力上玩不起,也觉得大学这种做法是“玩不起”。   仔细对照上海理工大的这份告示,免费的午餐还是有的,不过是限定在“每周一至周五8点到9点,冬季17点后,夏季18点后”,其余时间不对外开放。“周日及寒暑假白天”,学校田径场可以开放,但须收费。   免费的时段是鸡肋,收费的时段却是市民锻炼的黄金档。上海理工大学的算盘,打得还是有点精的。对此校方解释,到目前为止,并没有任何一个相关文件规定,这个免费的午餐必须得给,更何况还需要管理成本;并且,此前因为田径场无序开放,还频繁地发生外校人员与本校学生的冲突。   从学校免费与收费的时段设计来看,场地资源不是问题,真正的问题在于钱。一边是闲置的体育场馆与设施,一边是生活和运动空间更趋逼仄的市民,对于这些运动资源的“眼馋”;一边是实实在在的管理成本和可能带来的责任风险,一边是市民希望为自己提供一份健康福利。这些矛盾,不止上海,全国许多城市几乎都在面对。   尽管在政府部门牵头下,已有越来越多的学校拿出一定时段、场地提供给社会,但是一纸指导性文件,基本还停留在“义务”提供阶段。这应该是学校等一些机构热情不高的主要原因。毕竟出场地也就罢了,还得搭上人力,还有设施的损耗,更需要管理人员节假日加班,一个尴尬的局面由此而生——表面看,更多的大门在打开,但市民依旧觉得不解渴。   上海理工大学与居民之间的这场运动“交易”,实际上是拥有体育运动场馆与设施的一方,试图突破指导性文件盲区、解决现实尴尬的一次试水。收费高低暂不论,这也终究只是权宜之计。   从长远来看,包括学校在内的体育场馆与设施,科学合理地向社会开放,应是缓解城市居民日常健身困难的各种途径中,最省钱、最省事、最省心的一条出路。但是这条路,不该由经济杠杆的方式,由拥有资源的校方与渴望免费午餐的市民这两者来解决。一方面,双方的议价能力不在同一个基准线上;另一方面,在城市运动健身的配套设置上,相关部门给民众的欠账也足够多。   2014年国务院将全民健身上升为“国家战略”,在出台的若干意见中明确要求,“积极推动各级各类公共体育设施免费或低收费开放。加快推进企事业单位等体育设施向社会开放。学校体育场馆课余时间要向学生开放,加快推动学校体育场馆向社会开放”。近日召开的全国人大常委会会议上,也有常委会委员、地方和社会公众提出,大中小学的文化体育设施在不影响正常教学秩序的前提下,也应当向社会有序开放。   既然是“国家战略”,既然民众呼吁很高,从“国家战略”的投入中拨出一点资金,这些困难恐怕就不是个事儿了。以社会福利的形式,由政府部门补贴给学校,再让市民以福利的心态去享受,到那时,学校和市民还会感到为难吗?刘雪松   原标题:高校操场收费,谁该为此埋单相关的主题文章: